Bey v. Mantese et al
| Antonia Bey |
| Christopher Mantese, Chen Jingwan and Vito Mantese |
| 4:2024cv00517 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antonia Bey. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Chen Jingwan, Christopher Mantese, Vito Mantese, Non-Jury Demand, filed by Antonia Bey. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Apr 8 17:00:54 CDT 2024 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
