Malcich v. Autozone Inc Dept 8088
| David Malcich |
| Autozone Inc Dept 8088 |
| 4:2024cv00554 |
| April 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant Autozone Inc Dept 8088. The summons was hand delivered to USMS. (CLT) |
Filing 5
ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff David Malcich's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [ECF No. #2 ] Upon review of the financial affidavit, the Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to pay the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C.1915(a) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 4/18/2024. (CLT)
|
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by David Malcich. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Ashbrook, Amy) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Malcich. (Ashbrook, Amy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant AUTO ZONE, INC. DEPT 8088 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by David Malcich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #2 Attachment IFP Application and request for Summons, #3 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #4 Summons Summons)(Ashbrook, Amy) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Malcich v. Autozone Inc Dept 8088 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Malcich | |
| Represented By: | Amy Ashbrook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Autozone Inc Dept 8088 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
