Human v. International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO) et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Human
Defendant: International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO), International Union of Police Associations doing business as National Police and Troopers Association and Jone Doe 1-5
Case Number: 4:2024cv00570
Filed: April 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Sarah E Pitlyk
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants International Union of Police Associations, International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO) Sent To: Plaintiff (JWD)
April 19, 2024 Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, filed by Daniel Human.(JWD)
April 19, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Patrick Kane. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-10559785) by Defendants International Union of Police Associations, International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO). (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Kane, Patrick)
April 19, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 21st Judicial Circuit Court of St. Louis, case number 24SL-CC01286, with receipt number AMOEDC-10559038, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by International Union of Police Associations d/b/a National Police and Troopers Association, International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Served Complaint, #3 Exhibit Disclosure Form, #4 Exhibit State Court Docket, #5 Exhibit Notice to Plaintiff, #6 Original Filing Form) (Kane, Patrick)
April 19, 2024 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Human v. International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Human
Represented By: Edwin V. Butler, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO)
Represented By: Patrick Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Union of Police Associations doing business as National Police and Troopers Association
Represented By: Patrick Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jone Doe 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?