McDile v. State of Missouri et al
Kaylen Leron McDile |
State of Missouri and Stephan Lawhorn |
4:2024cv00609 |
April 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
John M Bodenhausen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Stephan Lawhorn, State of Missouri, Jury Demand, filed by Kaylen Leron McDile. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Apr 29 17:00:44 CDT 2024 (admin,) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.