Medders-Carpenter v. Canam Steel Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Jean Medders-Carpenter
Defendant: Canam Steel Corporation, Josh Summers, Amy Smith, Jane Doe and John Doe
Case Number: 4:2024cv00928
Filed: July 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Clark
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2024 Filing 31 REPLY to Response to Motion re #17 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Missouri State Court filed by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Ponder, Douglas)
August 19, 2024 Filing 30 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Missouri State Court filed by Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers. (McMillen, Joy)
August 19, 2024 Filing 29 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers. (McMillen, Joy)
August 12, 2024 Filing 28 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Josh Summers. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (McMillen, Joy)
August 12, 2024 Filing 27 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Amy Smith. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (McMillen, Joy)
August 9, 2024 Filing 26 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (TLR)
August 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER: The Court discharges its show-cause order and grants Medders-Carpenter's #20 Motion for Leave to File Response to Motion to Dismiss Out of Time. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to detach doc. [20-1] and file it separately on the docket. Defendants may file a reply within the time frame permitted by Local Rule 4.01. Medders-Carpenter also filed a motion to stay this case "other than for further briefing related to [her] Motion to Remand, while [her] Motion to Remand is considered." Doc. #22 at 9. The Court finds that a stay is unnecessary in these circumstances and accordingly denies Medders-Carpenter's #22 Motion to Stay. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 8/9/2024. (TLR)
August 8, 2024 Filing 24 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jean Medders-Carpenter. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Zimmermann, Jaclyn)
August 8, 2024 Filing 23 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter, Defendants Amy Smith, Josh Summers. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (LNJ)
August 7, 2024 Filing 22 MOTION to Stay by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Zimmermann, Jaclyn)
August 7, 2024 Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #20 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Motion to Dismiss out of Time filed by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Zimmermann, Jaclyn)
August 7, 2024 Filing 20 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Motion to Dismiss out of Time by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss)(Zimmermann, Jaclyn)
August 7, 2024 Filing 19 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #15 Order to Show Cause,,,, by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter filed by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Zimmermann, Jaclyn)
August 6, 2024 Filing 18 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #17 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Missouri State Court filed by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Ponder, Douglas)
August 6, 2024 Filing 17 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Missouri State Court by Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Ponder, Douglas)
August 6, 2024 Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by Douglas B. Ponder for Plaintiff Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Ponder, Douglas)
July 31, 2024 Filing 15 SHOW CAUSE ORDER: Jean Medders-Carpenter originally brought this case in state court, and Canam Steel Corporation removed the case to this Court. Doc. 1. Canam Steel and two individual defendants, both of whom Canam Steel alleges Medders-Carpenter fraudulently joined, then moved to dismiss this case. Docs. 7-8. To date, Medders-Carpenter has not filed any opposition to Defendants' motion. The Court now orders Medders-Carpenter to show cause, no later than August 7, 2024, why the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to prosecute and why it should not grant Defendants' motion to dismiss. If Medders-Carpenter wishes to file an opposition to Defendants' motion, she must, no later than August 7, 2024, move for leave to file out of time and include a copy of her opposition. Failure to comply with any part of this order will result in the Court dismissing this case without prejudice and without further notice. (Show Cause Response due by 8/7/2024.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 7/31/24. (JAB)
July 30, 2024 Filing 14 Docket Text ORDER: The Court orders the parties to review and comply with the undersigned's Judge's Requirements, located on the Eastern District of Missouri's court website: #Chief Judge Stephen R. Clark's Requirements. The undersigned periodically updates his Judge's Requirements, and the parties must ensure that they are complying with the most recent version before filing any document. Failure to comply with the requirements may result in the imposition of "sanction[s] or other disadvantage." Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 7/30/24. (JAB)
July 29, 2024 Filing 13 CJRA ORDER (NMG). Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah termed. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings. (HMA)
July 9, 2024 Filing 12 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto)
July 9, 2024 Filing 11 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Canam Steel Corporation, Canam US Holdings, Inc... (McMillen, Joy)
July 9, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #4 Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Canam Steel Corporation. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Party filed the Disclosure Statement in this action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C.1332(a) but, did not identify the name state of incorporation AND the primary state of business for defendant in section 2 of the Statement. An amended Disclosure Statement must be filed. (ANR)
July 9, 2024 Filing 9 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Franklin County Circuit Court, filed by Jean Medders-Carpenter. (Attachments: #1 MCHR Right to Sue Charging Letter)(JWD)
July 9, 2024 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD)
July 8, 2024 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers. (McMillen, Joy)
July 8, 2024 Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Charge of Discrimination)(McMillen, Joy)
July 8, 2024 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Lindsey Muse Bruno for Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers. (Bruno, Lindsey)
July 8, 2024 Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Joy D. McMillen for Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers. (McMillen, Joy)
July 8, 2024 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Canam Steel Corporation, Canam US Holdings, Inc... (McMillen, Joy)
July 8, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice to Clerk of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 - E-filing confirmation)(McMillen, Joy)
July 8, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Canam Steel Corporation, Amy Smith, Josh Summers Sent To: Plaintiff (McMillen, Joy)
July 8, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Franklin County, case number 24AB-CC00151, with receipt number AMOEDC-10698528, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Amy Smith, Josh Summers, Canam Steel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court File, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Ronald W. Peppe, II, #3 Civil Cover Sheet 3, #4 Original Filing Form 4)(McMillen, Joy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medders-Carpenter v. Canam Steel Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canam Steel Corporation
Represented By: Lindsey Muse Bruno
Represented By: Joy D. McMillen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Josh Summers
Represented By: Lindsey Muse Bruno
Represented By: Joy D. McMillen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Smith
Represented By: Lindsey Muse Bruno
Represented By: Joy D. McMillen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Medders-Carpenter
Represented By: Jaclyn Zimmermann
Represented By: Douglas B. Ponder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?