Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. v. Ameren Corp. et al
| Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. |
| Union Electric Co. and Ameren Corp. |
| 4:2024cv00980 |
| July 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Anthony G. Simon for Plaintiff Midwest Energy Emissions Corp.. (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Midwest Energy Emissions Corp.. (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Midwest Energy Emissions Corp.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. Process Server: Special Delivery Services, Inc. (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Ameren Corp., Union Electric Co. with receipt number AMOEDC-10717168, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Midwest Energy Emissions Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #8 Summons Summons - Ameren Corp, #9 Summons Summons - Union Electric)(Simon, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
