Hamilton v. Rawlani et al
William St. Johns Smith Hamilton |
Doc Unknown Rawlani and Administration |
4:2024cv01155 |
August 22, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Matthew T Schelp |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***REMARK - Case was electronically transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. (TMT) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff William St. Johns Smith Hamilton. (TMT) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff William St. Johns Smith Hamilton. (JWD) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff William St. Johns Smith Hamilton. (JWD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Administration, Unknown Rawlani, Jury Demand, filed by William St. Johns Smith Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Envelope)(JWD) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Aug 22 17:02:48 CDT 2024 (admin,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.