Branson v. Vida Medical, PC
| Amber Branson |
| Vida Medical, PC |
| 4:2024cv01337 |
| October 7, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
RULE 16 ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 2/7/2025. Rule 16 Conference set for 2/26/2025 01:30 PM in Chambers before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk.. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 11/18/2024. (LCR)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Vida Medical, PC. (Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Plaintiff Amber Branson. (Pleban, J.) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Vida Medical, PC.(Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Vida Medical, PC. (Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Vida Medical, PC. (Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Amber Branson.(JWD) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant VIDA MEDICAL, P.C. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by VIDA MEDICAL, P.C.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant VIDA MEDICAL, P.C. Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal, #2 Attachment Notice to Clerk of Removal)(Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Alexis L. Silsbe for Defendant VIDA MEDICAL, P.C.. (Silsbe, Alexis) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas E. Berry, Jr for Defendant VIDA MEDICAL, P.C.. (Berry, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County, case number 24SL-CC04038, with receipt number AMOEDC-10867638, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by VIDA MEDICAL, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Berry, Thomas) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Branson v. Vida Medical, PC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vida Medical, PC | |
| Represented By: | Alexis L. Silsbe |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Berry, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amber Branson | |
| Represented By: | J. C. Pleban |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
