Simon v. Monsanto Company
Deannie Simon |
Monsanto Company |
4:2024cv01627 |
December 3, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Rodney H Holmes |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***REMARK Case transferred from Missouri Eastern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:25-cv-00482, filed 01/14/2025. (JBH) |
![]() |
Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-498) regarding MDL 2741 by Clerk of the Panel. Signed by Marcella R. Lockert on 1/6/25. (JWD) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re Disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiff. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Party filed the Disclosure Statement in this action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity but failed to properly complete the Court adopted form with diversity information. Individual parties must list their name and state of citizenship (Not residence or domicile) in Section 2. An amended Disclosure Statement must be filed immediately, using the Court adopted form. # (moed-0001.pdf). (CBL) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deannie Simon. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (King, Tara) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Deannie Simon. Monsanto Company served on 12/16/2024, answer due 1/6/2025. (King, Tara) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney H. Holmes. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Tara K. King. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Deannie Simon Process Server: Midwest Process Server (King, Tara) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Deannie Simon against defendant Monsanto Company with receipt number AMOEDC-10967414, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Deannie Simon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons)(King, Tara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Simon v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deannie Simon | |
Represented By: | Tara K. King |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.