Barnett v. Fox et al
| Dewey Austin Barnett, II |
| Andrew Fox and St. Louis City |
| 4:2025cv00307 |
| March 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Shirley Padmore Mensah |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF SAME by Plaintiff Dewey Austin Barnett, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CLH)
|
|
Filing 8
Receipt: $ 1.00, receipt number 25356 Civil Filing Fee/PLRA/CCAM on behalf of MISSOURI DEPT OF CORRECTIONS (CCAM). (auto)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT re #4 Order of Dismissal by Plaintiff Dewey Austin Barnett, II. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 6
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Dewey Barnett. Returned document(s): Complaint Letter Created, Complaint Letter Processed, Case Opening Notification,. Could not verify new address and mail was not resent. (CLH)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3, 4. Orders sent to party not electronically notified this date. Thu May 15 10:07:58 CDT 2025 (CBL)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (CLH)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5. Mailed to party not set up for electronic delivery. Wed May 14 11:11:03 CDT 2025 (CLH)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/13/2025. (CLH) Modified on 5/14/2025 (CLH).
|
|
Filing 3
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion seeking leave to commence this action without prepaying fees or costs [ECF No. #2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.00. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) the statement that the remittance is for an original proceeding.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims in this action are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/13/2025. (CLH)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Mar 12 13:01:08 CDT 2025
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dewey Austin Barnett, II. (JBH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant Andrew Fox, St. Louis City Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Dewey Austin Barnett, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Exhibit Memo, #3 Exhibit Petition)(JBH)
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JBH)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JBH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
