Nichols v. St. Louis County et al
| Craig Steven Nichols, Jr |
| St. Louis County, Douglas B. Rudman, Officer Unknown Bryant and Unknown Kirksey |
| 4:2025cv00529 |
| April 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney H Holmes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Before the Court is plaintiff Nichols' motion for default judgment. [ECF No. #7 ]. This matter was dismissed preservice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) on July 14, 2025. [ECF Nos. #5 and #6 ]. As such, plaintiff's motion for default judgment will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for default judgment [ECF No. #7 ] is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/18/2025. (HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. copy sent to non-electronic party this date. Fri Jul 18 12:39:48 CDT 2025 (HMA)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Default Judgment for a sum certain amount by Plaintiff Craig Steven Nichols, Jr. (CLH)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/14/2025. (CLH)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion seeking leave to commence this action without prepaying fees or costs [ECF No. #3 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. #2 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/14/2025. (CLH)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5, 6. Mailed to party not set up for electronic delivery. Mon Jul 14 12:54:22 CDT 2025 (CLH)
|
|
Filing 4
Letter from Clerk sent to Plaintiff Craig Steven Nichols, Jr re: Failure to file Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 6/12/2025. (Attachments: #1 Form) (CLH)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Mailed to party not set up for electronic delivery. Thu Jun 5 09:45:28 CDT 2025 (CLH)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Apr 17 16:01:20 CDT 2025
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Craig Steven Nichols, Jr. (JBH)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Craig Steven Nichols, Jr. (JBH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Craig Steven Nichols, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(JBH)
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney H. Holmes. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JBH)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JBH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
