Arex Industries, Inc. v. Diode Dynamics, LLC et al
| Arex Industries, Inc. |
| Diode Dynamics, LLC and Does 1-10 |
| 4:2025cv00541 |
| April 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cristian M Stevens |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following cases shall be transferred to District Judge Cristian M. Stevens. All deadlines previously set remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark no longer assigned to case. Case reassigned to District Judge Cristian M. Stevens for all further proceedings. (KXS) |
| Filing 27 REPLY to Response to Motion re #25 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply filed by Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc.. (Chen, Alexander) |
| Filing 26 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #25 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply filed by Defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC. (Robinson, Douglas) |
| Filing 25 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply by Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Chen, Alexander) |
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #22 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC. (Robinson, Douglas) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #22 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc.. (Chen, Alexander) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint by Defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Paul McCain, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Robinson, Douglas) |
| Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC, Does 1-10 , filed by Arex Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 USD1055331, #2 Exhibit 2 2023-11-02 Letter to Diode Dynamics, #3 Exhibit 3 2023.11.21 Ltr. D. Robinson to A. Chen, #4 Exhibit 4 2024.06.10 Ltr. D. Robinson to A. Chen, #5 Exhibit A Redline of Original to Amended Complaint)(Telscher, Rudolph) |
| Filing 20 Docket Text ORDER: The Court received Arex Industries's amended complaint, doc. 19, submitted as a matter of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Arex Industries's submission, however, does not comply with the Court's Local Rules or the undersigned's Judge's Requirements. See E.D.Mo. L.R. 4.07 ("All new material in the amended pleading must be underlined and all material being removed must be struck through."); Judge's Requirements at 4 ("When amending a pleading as a matter of right, you must include, as an exhibit to the amended pleading, the amended pleading with all changes tracked for comparison with the original pleading."). The Court orders that Arex Industries may refile, no later than June 9, 2025, its amended complaint in compliance with the Local Rules and Judge's Requirements. (Amended Pleading due by 6/9/2025.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 6/5/25. (JAB) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC, Does 1-10 , filed by Arex Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 USD1055331, #2 Exhibit 2 2023-11-02 Letter to Diode Dynamics, #3 Exhibit 3 2023.11.21 Ltr. D. Robinson to A. Chen, #4 Exhibit 4 2024.06.10 Ltr. D. Robinson to A. Chen)(Telscher, Rudolph) |
| Filing 18 Docket Text ORDER: Pursuant to Arex Industries's notice of withdrawal of its motion for preliminary injunction, doc. 17; see doc. 4, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to withdraw the motion for preliminary injunction, doc. 4, from the docket. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 5/29/25. (JAB) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to WITHDRAW Motion for Preliminary Injunction: by Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc. re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Telscher, Rudolph) (Modified on 5/21/2025, update filing from Notice to Motion) (TLR). |
| Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by Christopher Reed Clayton for Defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC. (Clayton, Christopher) |
| Filing 15 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants Arex Industries's #13 Consent Motion for Extension of Time and Stay of Preliminary Injunction Deadline. Therefore, Diode Dynamics must, no later than June 3, 2025, file its response to the complaint. The Court also orders that the parties must, no later than May 20, 2025, submit their proposed schedule(s) regarding Arex Industries's motion for a preliminary injunction. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 5/6/2025. (TLR) |
| Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Diode Dynamics, LLC. [LLC members added into CM/ECF per the Disclosure Statement]. (Robinson, Douglas) Modified on 5/6/2025 (ANR). |
| Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction , #1 Complaint, by Defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robinson, Douglas) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Douglas A. Robinson for Defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC. (Robinson, Douglas) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Arex Industries, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Chen, Alexander) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Arex Industries, Inc.. Diode Dynamics, LLC served on 4/22/2025, answer due 5/13/2025. (Telscher, Rudolph) Modified service/answer dates on 4/24/2025 (LNJ). |
| Filing 9 Docket Text ORDER: The Court orders the parties to review and comply with the undersigned's Judge's Requirements, located on the Eastern District of Missouri's court website: #Chief Judge Stephen R. Clark's Requirements. The undersigned periodically updates his Judge's Requirements, and the parties must ensure that they are complying with the most recent version before filing any document. Failure to comply with the requirements may result in the imposition of "sanction[s] or other disadvantage." Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 4/22/2025. (TLR) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Theodore S. Lee for Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc.. (Lee, Theodore) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Alexander Chen for Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc.. (Chen, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding patent. (JBH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc.. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Party filed the Disclosure Statement in this action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C.1332(a) but, did not identify the state of incorporation/formation AND the primary state of business for Arex Industries, Inc. in section 2 of the form. An amended Disclosure statement must be filed. (ANR) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Chief U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
| Filing 4 --WITHDRAWN per doc #18-- MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum ISO of Preliminary Injunction, #2 Chan Decl. ISO Prelim Injunction, #3 Exhibit 2-Chan Decl., #4 Exhibit 3-Chan Decl., #5 Exhibit 4-Chan Decl., #6 Exhibit 5-Chan Decl., #7 Exhibit 6-Chan Decl., #8 Exhibit 7-Chan Decl., #9 Noble Decl. ISO Prelim Injunction, #10 Exhibit 1-Noble Decl., #11 Text of Proposed Order)(Telscher, Rudolph) Modified on 5/29/2025 (JAB). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Plaintiff Arex Industries, Inc. re #1 Complaint, Form AO120 (Telscher, Rudolph) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Arex Industries, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Telscher, Rudolph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Diode Dynamics, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive with receipt number AMOEDC-11210272, in the amount of $405 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Arex Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Patent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Summons)(Telscher, Rudolph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
