Trautman v. Bisignano
| Patrick A Trautman |
| Frank J. Bisignano |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 4:2025cv00583 |
| April 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Docket Text Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Complaint (Doc. #11 ) is GRANTED. Social Security Brief due by 10/22/25. Social Security Cross Brief due by 11/21/25. Social Security Reply Brief due by 12/5/25. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 10/21/2025. (SLS)
|
| Filing 11 Third MOTION for Extension of: Time to File Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Complaint by Plaintiff Patrick A Trautman. (Van Fossan, Kristen) |
Filing 10
Docket Text Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Complaint (Doc. 9) is GRANTED. Social Security Brief due by 9/22/2025. Social Security Cross Brief due by 10/22/2025. Social Security Reply Brief due by 11/5/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 8/25/25. (SLS)
|
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of: Time to File Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Complaint by Plaintiff Patrick A Trautman. (Van Fossan, Kristen) |
Filing 8
Docket Text Order: IT IS HERERBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Complaint (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. Social Security Brief due by 8/25/2025. Social Security Cross Brief due by 9/24/2025. Social Security Reply Brief due by 10/8/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 7/24/25. (SLS)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of: Time to File Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Complaint by Plaintiff Patrick A Trautman. (Van Fossan, Kristen) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED Social Security Transcript Notice of Filing by Defendant Leland Dudek (Attachments: #1 Transcript 1, #2 Transcript 2, #3 Transcript 3, #4 Transcript 4, #5 Transcript 5, #6 Transcript 6, #7 Transcript 7, #8 Transcript 8, #9 Transcript 9, #10 Transcript 10, #11 Transcript 11, #12 Transcript 12)(Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
Filing 5
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case is assigned to Track: 4. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 04/29/2025. (KRZ)
|
| Filing 4 FULL CONSENT has been received by Defendant Leland Dudek, Interested Party SSA Office of General Counsel, and Plaintiff Patrick A Trautman. (KRZ) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Leland Dudek. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Administrative Transcript Due 6/27/2025 (JBH) |
| Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY IDENTIFICATION FORM as to Plaintiff Patrick Trautman. (Van Fossan, Kristen) |
| Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT with receipt number AMOEDC-11223790, in the amount of $405 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - No,, filed by Patrick Trautman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Original Filing Form original filing form)(Van Fossan, Kristen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.