Chavez v. Baker et al
| Anthony De Juan Chavez |
| Sarah Baker, Kenneth Foster and Chris Dourgthy |
| 4:2026cv00366 |
| March 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NON-PRISONER MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony De Juan Chavez. (KJS) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Mar 26 12:02:21 CDT 2026 |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Anthony De Juan Chavez. (Attachments: #1 FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE)(DLB) |
| Filing 1 Document construed as PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant Sarah Baker, Chris Dourgthy, Kenneth Foster Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Anthony De Juan Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(DLB) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/26/2026) (DLB). |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
