Ghosal v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Petitioner: Sambuddha Ghosal
Respondent: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullin and Thomas C. Albus
Case Number: 4:2026cv00817
Filed: May 22, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Clark
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2026 Filing 15 Docket Text ORDER: Ghosal filed a notice of supplemental information, asking the Court to defer ruling on Defendants' pending motion to dismiss until after Ghosal completes his interview with USCIS on July 29, 2026. See doc. 13. Accordingly, the Court grants Ghosal's #13 request and orders Ghosal to file a status report with the Court no later than July 31, 2026. (Response to Court due by 7/31/2026.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 7/16/2026. (TLR)
July 14, 2026 Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File a Sur-Reply by Petitioner Sambuddha Ghosal. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Sur-Reply in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(TLR)
July 14, 2026 Filing 13 NOTICE of Supplemental Information Regarding the Pending Motion to Dismiss by Petitioner Sambuddha Ghosal. (TLR)
July 6, 2026 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) filed by Respondents Thomas C. Albus, Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Blank, Shane)
July 1, 2026 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) filed by Petitioner Sambuddha Ghosal. (LNS)
June 25, 2026 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) filed by Respondents Thomas C. Albus, Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Blank, Shane)
June 25, 2026 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) by Respondents Thomas C. Albus, Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Blank, Shane)
June 25, 2026 Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Shane Kyle Blank for Respondents Thomas C. Albus, Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Blank, Shane)
June 22, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Certificate of Service by Petitioner Sambuddha Ghosal re #6 Response to Order to Show Cause (LNS)
June 10, 2026 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Petitioner Sambuddha Ghosal. (JAB)
June 2, 2026 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Sambuddha Ghosal. Defendant Thomas C. Albus served on 5/26/2026, answer due 7/27/2026; Todd Blanche served on 5/27/2026, answer due 7/27/2026; Joseph B. Edlow served on 5/26/2026, answer due 7/27/2026; Markwayne Mullin served on 5/26/2026, answer due 7/27/2026; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/26/2026, answer due 7/27/2026. (JAB)
June 2, 2026 Filing 4 SHOW-CAUSE ORDER: Accordingly, the Court orders Ghosal to show cause, no later than June 16, 2026, why the Court should not dismiss this action in light of the Court's recent decision in Mokone. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Show Cause Response due by 6/16/2026.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 6/2/26. (JAB)
May 28, 2026 Filing 3 Docket Text ORDER: The Court orders the parties to review and comply with the undersigned's Judge's Requirements, located on the Eastern District of Missouri's court website: #Chief Judge Stephen R. Clark's Requirements. The undersigned periodically updates his Judge's Requirements, and the parties must ensure that they are complying with the most recent version before filing any document. Failure to comply with the requirements may result in the imposition of "sanction[s] or other disadvantage." Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 5/28/2026. (LNS)
May 26, 2026 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue May 26 15:00:32 CDT 2026
May 26, 2026 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
May 22, 2026 Receipt: $ 405.00, receipt number 28606 Civil Filing Fee- Non-Prisoner on behalf of SAMBUDDHA GHOSAL (CCAM). (auto)
May 22, 2026 Filing 2 Request for Electronic Noticing from Sambuddha Ghosal. Email Address will be added to the party's record. (JAB)
May 22, 2026 Receipt: $ 405.00, receipt number #28606 filing fee. (DLB)
May 22, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against defendant Thomas C. Albus, Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Sambuddha Ghosal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit A-D, #4 Summons)(DLB)
May 22, 2026 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Chief U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. 5 Summons(es) issued and hand delivered to Sambuddha Ghosal. (DLB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ghosal v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sambuddha Ghosal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Shane Kyle Blank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Todd Blanche
Represented By: Shane Kyle Blank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph B. Edlow
Represented By: Shane Kyle Blank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Markwayne Mullin
Represented By: Shane Kyle Blank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas C. Albus
Represented By: Shane Kyle Blank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?