Sulaiman Khil v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Mohammad Sulaiman Sulaiman Khil |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph B. Edlow and Rose M. Kendrick |
| 4:2026cv01082 |
| July 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Shirley Padmore Mensah |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Joseph B. Edlow, Rose M. Kendrick, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services with receipt number AMOEDC-11968001, in the amount of $405 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Mohammad Sulaiman Sulaiman Khil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons SUMMONS USCIS, #3 Summons SUMMONS USCIS DIRECTOR, #4 Summons SUMMONS USCIS LOCAL, #5 Summons SUMMONS ATT. GRAL., #6 Summons SUMMONS US ATT., #7 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Hacking, James) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah. 5 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Plaintiff's Attorney. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (DMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
