Pierce v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Jodi C. Pierce
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2011cv00105
Filed: September 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Billings Office
County: ROSEBUD
Presiding Judge: Richard F. Cebull
Presiding Judge: Carolyn S Ostby
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Commissioner's decision denying disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is affirmed. Pierce's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and the Commissioner's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 8/6/2012. (NOB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jodi C. Pierce
Represented By: John E. Seidlitz, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?