Chesterman v. Salmonsen et al
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman |
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana |
1:2023cv00117 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Timothy J Cavan |
Susan P Watters |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Timothy Lloyd Chesterman. Motions referred to Timothy J. Cavan. (TAG) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Timothy Lloyd Chesterman. (HEG) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 10/20/2023. Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to inmate. (TAG) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (3 pgs.) by Timothy Lloyd Chesterman. (TAG) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Letter re account statement, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 E-filing Notice)Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to inmate. (TAG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Timothy Lloyd Chesterman. Motions referred to Timothy J. Cavan. (TAG) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 not paid), filed by Timothy Lloyd Chesterman. (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.