Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Witkowski v. Salmonsen, et al.
as 24-2448
Petitioner: JAY DONALD WITKOWSKI
Respondent: JIM SALMONSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Thunder v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Barry Glenn Thunder
Defendant: Jim Salmonsen, Sergeant Hotchkiss, Correctional Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff: RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant: DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Sellers v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff: Donnie Mack Sellers
Defendant: Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Kristy Cobban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krankowski v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00018
Plaintiff: Brandon Anthony Krankowski
Defendant: Brian M. Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen and Montana State Prison Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Salmonsen, et al.
as 24-802
Petitioner: DONNIE NOLAN
Respondent: JIM SALMONSEN, GREEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Smart v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Petitioner: Forrest Scott Smart
Respondent: Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friedt v. Salmonsen
as 24-566
Petitioner: DENNIS MARTIN FRIEDT
Respondent: JIM SALMONSEN
Keefe v. Salmonsen et al
as 4:2024cv00006
Petitioner: Steven Wayne Keefe
Respondent: Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: Mitchell Scott Patterson
Defendant: Montana Department of Corrections, Brian M. Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?