Rothing v. Lambert et al
| Peter Rothing |
| Steve White, Joe Skinner, Marty Lambert, Holly Brown and John Brown |
| 2:2013cv00086 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Butte Office |
| GALLATIN |
| Dana L. Christensen |
| Carolyn S Ostby |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 41 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 6/11/2014. Mailed to Rothing. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying as moot 34 Motion to Clarify; denying 35 Motion to Supplement; denying 36 Motion to Conform Pleadings to the Evidence ; denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 5/16/2014. Mailed to Rothing with copy of 15 as directed. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim; granting 7 Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process; denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 12 Motion for Entry of Default ; denying 23 "Combined Motion to Seek Determination and/or Declaration of Legal Rights, Status or other Legal Relations"; granting 28 Motion to Supplement Pleadings. The Court will allow Rothing sixty days from the date of this Order to file proof of proper service upon identified Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 3/24/2014. Mailed to Rothing. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
