Oram v. The Dillon City Police Department et al
| Gary Oram, Jr. |
| The Dillon City Police Department, Ceth Haggard, Jeremy Alvarez and Jacob Johnson |
| 2:2015cv00047 |
| September 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Butte Office |
| BEAVERHEAD |
| Jeremiah C. Lynch |
| Brian Morris |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
ORDER denying as moot 171 Motion for Order to Deposit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's taxation of costs as contained in Documents 163 and 164 remain imposed against Oram. Oram shall pay taxation of costs in the amount of $1,077.75 to Defendants Ceth Haggard and Jeremy Alvarez. (Doc. 163.) Oram shall pay taxation of costs in the amount of $654.70 to Defendant City of Dillon. (Doc. 164.) Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/10/2019. (Copy to Oram.) (NOS)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER denying 149 Motion for Rule 60 Relief from Final Judgment/Reconsideration; denying 157 Motion for Relief in Equity. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. Further filings may result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 1/9/2018. (Copy mailed to Oram.) (NOS)
|
|
Filing
146
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of The City of Dillon, Ceth Haggard, Jacob Johnson, Jeremy Alvarez against Gary Oram, Jr (ELL) Modified on 8/23/2017 to indicate that a copy was mailed to Oram (ELL).
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER granting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 101 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part Findings and Recommendations re 130 Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Lynch's Finding s and Recommendations (No. 130) is ADOPTED IN FULL. Officers Jeremy Alvarez and Ceth Haggard's Motion for Summary Judgment (No.93) and the City of Dillon's Motion for Summary Judgment (No. 101) are GRANTED. Oram's claims in this case r elated to Officers Alvarez and Haggard, and the City of Dillon and the Dillon City Police Department are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conf scheduled for 1/5/17 at 3:30 p, and the trial scheduled for 1/23/17, at 9:00 am are VACATED pending further action from the Court. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 12/20/2016. (ELL) Modified on 12/20/2016 to indicate that a copy was mailed to Oram by U.S. Mail (ELL).
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER denying as moot 111 MOTION in Limine filed by The Dillon City Police Department, The City of Dillon, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 101 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Dillon City Police Department, The City of Dillon, 93 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ceth Haggard, Jeremy Alvarez. (), Motions terminated: 111 MOTION in Limine filed by The Dillon City Police Department, The City of Dillon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 11/29/2016. (TCL, ) Modified on 11/29/2016 Copy of Order sent to pro se Oram with docket sheet by U.S. Mail (ELL, ).
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 46 Motion for Entry of Default Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 6/15/2016. (TCL, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 51 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 53 Motion for Attorney Fees Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 6/8/2016. (TCL, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 12 Motion for Order/Judgment Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 11/16/2015. (TCL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
