Taylor v. Target Corporation et al
| Murtisiah Taylor |
| Target Corporation, Does 1-10 and ABC Companies 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv00067 |
| September 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Brian Morris |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Contract Court Reporter is Needed: Amended Pleadings and Joinder of Parties due by 11/19/2021. Discovery closes 7/11/2022. All pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, shall be filed and fully briefed on or before 9/9/2022. Proposed Final Pretrial Order due by 11/8/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/30/2022 at 01:30 PM in Great Falls, MT before Judge Brian Morris. Jury Trial set for 12/13/2022 at 09:00 AM in Butte, MT before Judge Brian Morris. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS AND ALL DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/14/2021. (SLR)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Murtisiah Taylor. (Rabb, Michael) Modified on 10/7/2021 to add word "Amended". (SLR). |
| Filing 9 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Murtisiah Taylor. (Rabb, Michael) |
| Filing 8 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Murtisiah Taylor. (Rabb, Michael) |
| Filing 7 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Target Corporation. (MMS) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT OF STIPULATED FACTS by Murtisiah Taylor. (Rabb, Michael) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT (State Court) for Damages Jury Trial Demanded against ABC Companies 1-10, Does 1-10, Target Corporation, filed by Murtisiah Taylor. (TLO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal from Montana 18th Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, consisting of (Attachments: #1 State Court Docket, #2 Plaintiff's Praecipe, #3 Summons Returned Served, #4 Email filing - Defendant's Answer and Demand for Jury Trial, #5 Order for Stipulated Scheduling Order, #6 Stipulated Scheduling Order, #7 Plaintiff's Lay Witness and Associated Exhibits List, #8 Email Filing - Unopposed Motion to Amend Stipulated Scheduling Order and Extend Deadlines, #9 First Amended Scheduling Order, #10 Original Filing - Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Amend Stipulated Scheduling Order and Extend Deadlines, #11 Defendant Target Corporation's Lay Witness and Exhibit List, #12 Plaintiff's Request for Statement of Damages, #13 Email Filing - Plaintiff's Response to Request for Statement of Damages) (TLO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/16/2021: #15 Transfer Receipt) (TLO). |
| Remark; State Court documents were received and are maintained in Butte Division (TLO) |
|
Filing 3
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 10/6/2021. Joint Discovery Plan due by 10/6/2021. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 10/6/2021. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 10/13/2021 at 03:00 PM in Great Falls, MT before Judge Brian Morris. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS, ALL DEADLINES, AND CALL-IN INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/2/2021. (SLR)
|
| Filing 2 Letter from Tyler P. Gilman, Clerk of Court, to Counsel Kristen L. Corn re CM/ECF registration. Letter mailed to Counsel Corn. (SLR) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, case number DV-21-11C. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Lanning Affidavit, #3 State Court File) (SLR) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 0977-2720505. (SLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
