Moore v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Edward T. Moore
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2010cv00036
Filed: June 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Great Falls Office
County: CASCADE
Presiding Judge: Sam E Haddon
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 1) Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2) The Commissioner's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. 3) This case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Findings and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/20/2011. (SLR, ) Modified on 4/21/2011 to correct date of Order. (SLR, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward T. Moore
Represented By: William O. Bronson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?