Jones v. Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
Petitioner: Howard Jones
Respondent: Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
Case Number: 4:2015cv00086
Filed: September 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Great Falls Office
County: ROOSEVELT
Presiding Judge: John Johnston
Presiding Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER adopting Findings and Recommendations 6 in full. Petition 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 3/2/2016. Mailed to Jones. (TAG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Howard Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?