Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Jones v. Dixon, et al
as 3:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Howard Jones, IV
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Cook, J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. BP Expl & Prod
as 23-30763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Howard Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JONES v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JONES, IV
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, MS COOK, J JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 4:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Howard Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith-Jones et al v. RJ's Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Chandler Smith-Jones and Howard Jones
Defendant:
RJ's Transportation, LLC, A&R Logistics, Inc., Quantix SCS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
US v. Howard Jones
as 22-4122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HOWARD JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv18917
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JONES and JODELL JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
