Keefe v. M.S.P. I.P.S. Officers et al
| Jordan Keefe |
| M.S.P. I.P.S. Officers, Thorne Blackcrow, Medical Staff, C/O Buresh, Amber Holly, Tom Simpkins, Tammy, Joanne Reese, C/O Wheat, Montana State Prison and Jim |
| 6:2015cv00103 |
| November 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Helena Office |
| POWELL |
| Dana L. Christensen |
| John Johnston |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Relief; granting 23 Motion to Notify. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/5/2016. Mailed to Keefe. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 in full. All Defendants other than Officer Buresh including: MSP I.P.S. Officers, Thome Blackcrow, Medical Staff, Joanne Reese, Tom Simpkins, Tammy, Jim, Amber, Holly, Correctional Officer Wheat, and Montana State Prison, are DISMISSED. All claims other than Mr. Keefe's claim against Officer Buresh are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 6/14/2016. Mailed to Keefe. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; denying 5 "Motion for Hearing for Cause and for Relief by Reason of a Preliminary Injunction"; denying 9 "Motion to Claim an Inability to Proceed Under Judge Johnston by Plaintiff Jordan Keefe". Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 2/2/2016. Mailed to Keefe. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
