Cases 1 - 10 of 100
ROUDA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv02030
Plaintiff:
JIM ROUDA
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Brahler-Barnes v. Elliott et al
as 2:2026cv02149
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Brahler-Barnes
Defendant:
Veronica Elliott, Pamela Feemster, Sandra Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King, Jr. v. TDCJ-ID Jim Ferguson Unit Staff et al ***Transferred to the SD/TX, Houston Division***
as 9:2026cv00750
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID Jim Ferguson Unit Staff, Romeo C. Nana, Treshay S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hall et al
as 2:2026cv04004
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Karl Hall, Miriam Klinger, Jim Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03568
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02435
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHURCHVILLE v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv06853
Plaintiff:
JIM-VAR CHURCHVILLE
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03569
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03570
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pink v. Harpe, et al
as 26-7060
Plaintiff:
LO'RE PINK, AKA Johnny L. Hardeman
Defendant:
STEVEN HARPE, ELIZABETH SCHLUTER, R. GULBERT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
