Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Flemons (PS) v. McCoy
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Jim McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Farley et al
as 1:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Jim Farley and Ford Motors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Johnson (PS) v. Brady et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Jill Brady, Jenna Kruszka, Catherine Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Biggs v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv03148
Plaintiff:
Jim Sherwood Biggs
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Smith (PS) et al v. WCDTF et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Smith and Holly M Smith
Defendant:
WCDTF, GJPD, Sherrifs Office and others
Gonzalez (PS) v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kalma Harris, A Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royal Centers et al v. Marsal et al
as 1:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Royal Centers and Jim Kher Deen
Defendant:
Aria Marsal, SSS LLC, Security Surveillance Sustem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
