Bruck v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Gaynell M. Bruck
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 6:2018cv00062
Filed: May 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Helena Office
County: LEWIS & CLARK
Presiding Judge: Sam E Haddon
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDERED: This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/11/2019. (HEG)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting 62 Motion to Redact. Plaintiff shall file a redacted Exhibit A to Mrs. Bruck's Response Brief in Opposition to Target's Motion in Limine to Exclude New Evidence of Dr. Michelotti. The clerk is directed to seal the unredac ted Exhibit A attached to Mrs. Brock's Response Brief in Opposition to Target's Motion in Limine to Exclude New Evidence of Dr. Michelotti. All documents relied upon by the Court in resolving any issue before the Court, including documents filed under seal, will be made public contemporaneously with the Court's ruling on the issue. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/26/2019. (HEG)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDERED: Mrs. Bruck's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses From Target Corporation is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 3/28/2019. (HEG)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDERED: Each party shall forthwith file with the Court complete copies of all discovery requests proposed to the opposing party and complete copies of all responses to discovery provided. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 3/26/2019. (HEG)
January 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER re 26 Disclosure Statement filed by Target Corporation. Defendant shall serve and file the report prepared in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) and the Scheduling Order of July 16, 2018, on or before January 25, 2019. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 1/14/2019. (HEG)
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDERED: Necessary and appropriate revisions to the preliminary pretrial statements to address the deficiencies outlined in paragraphs 1 and 2 above shall be filed and served on or before July 6, 2018. (see order) Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/2/2018. (HEG)
May 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDERED: This case will be dismissed on May 29, 2018, unless Plaintiff files an additional amended pleading properly alleging jurisdiction on or before that date. A third opportunity to properly plead jurisdiction will not be accorded. In the absence of an appropriate filing, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 5/21/2018. (HEG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bruck v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gaynell M. Bruck
Represented By: Michael D. McLean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Allen P. Lanning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?