Fadely v. Salmonsen
Petitioner: Brandon Thomas Fadely
Respondent: Jim Salmonsen
Case Number: 6:2018cv00085
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Helena Office
County: RAVALLI
Presiding Judge: John Johnston
Referring Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 TRANSFER ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 8/7/2018. Mailed to Fadely with form (TAG)
August 7, 2018 Intradistrict Transfer to Missoula. CV 18-138-M (TAG)
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 not paid), filed by Brandon Thomas Fadely. (TAG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fadely v. Salmonsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jim Salmonsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brandon Thomas Fadely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?