Shreves v. Harris et al
Richard E. Shreves |
Michael Bury, Michael Zuber, Chris Conell, David William Harris, Daniel Ramirez, Kristy Cobban, Leon A. Granwold, Tony Matter, Robert Lishman, Colleen Ambrose, Wendy Zuber, Thomas Wood, Justin Pomeroy, Reginald D. Michael, Marisa Bostwick, Loraine Wodnik, Michael Fletcher, Christopher Francom and Jeffrey McNabb |
6:2018cv00097 |
October 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Dana L Christensen |
John Johnston |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Shreves. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/18/2018. Mailed to Shreves and MSP (TAG) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/18/2018. Mailed to Shreves (TAG) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Shreves with docket sheet. (TAG) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 400 not paid), filed by Richard E. Shreves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-27, #2 Exhibit 28-40, #3 Exhibit 41-53, #4 Letter) (TAG) Modified on 10/18/2018: complaint deemed filed (TAG). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Richard E. Shreves. Motions referred to John Johnston. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement) (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.