Medina v. Graham et al
| Jimmy Lee Medina |
| Arron Graham, Jim Salmonsen, Thomas Wilson, Carrie Walstead and Christine Slaughter |
| 6:2022cv00041 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Sam E Haddon |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Mailed to Medina (TAG) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 8/3/2022. Mailed to Medina (TAG)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Medina. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 6/15/2022. Mailed to Medina and CCC (TAG)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 6/15/2022. Mailed to Medina (TAG)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Medina with docket sheet (TAG) |
| Filing 2 LODGED COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by Jimmy Lee Medina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (TAG) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jimmy Lee Medina (Attachments: #1 Account Statement) (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
