WV, et al v. Peter Buttigieg, et al
State of West Virginia, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Iowa, State of Indiana, State of Kansas, State of Mississippi, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of Nebraska, State of New Hampshire, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of Texas, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, State of South Dakota, State of Utah, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Wyoming, State of Idaho, STATE OF LOUISIANA and State of North Dakota |
PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, SOPHIE SHULMAN and NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION |
06/1:24-ca-03560 |
July 9, 2024 |
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE FOR CONSOLIDATION ORDER -- re: pldg. (2 in 01/1:24-ca-01617, 2 in 02/1:24-ca-01770, 2 in 05/1:24-ca-60311, 2 in 06/1:24-ca-03539, 2 in 06/1:24-ca-03560, 2 in 06/1:24-ca-03572, 2 in 08/1:24-ca-02224, 2 in DC/1:24-ca-01215, 5 in MCP No. 189) -- Received from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation Associated Cases: MCP No. 189, 01/1:24-ca-01617, 02/1:24-ca-01770, 05/1:24-ca-60311, 06/1:24-ca-03539, 06/1:24-ca-03560, 06/1:24-ca-03572, 08/1:24-ca-02224, DC/1:24-ca-01215 (Koppel, Joshua) Modified on 7/16/2024 (JC). EDITED PARTY NAME |
Filing 3 ***TEXT ONLY NOTICE***NOTICE OF FILING OF CONSOLIDATION ORDER (MCP-189) re: pldg. (2 in 01/1:24-ca-01617, 2 in 02/1:24-ca-01770, 2 in 05/1:24-ca-60311, 2 in 06/1:24-ca-03539, 2 in 06/1:24-ca-03560, 2 in 06/1:24-ca-03572, 2 in 08/1:24-ca-02224, 2 in DC/1:24-ca-01215, 5 in MCP No. 189) ACTION REQUIRED BY: Joshua M. Koppel, Esq., National Highway Safety Administration, Department of Transportation Proof of Service due on or before 7/19/2024.The Panel has served the consolidation order on the National Highway Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, however the individual or individuals, or anyone designated by the agency, shall serve the Panel's consolidation order on all parties in all petitions for review included in the Panel's consolidation order, and shall submit proof of that service to the Clerk of the Panel by the date noted above.Notification of service can be filed via CM/ECF, in which filing registration is required. Please visit #http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov for instructions on how to register for CM/ECF.Signed by Acting Clerk of the Panel Marcella R. Lockert on 7/12/2024. Associated Cases: MCP No. 189, 01/1:24-ca-01617, 02/1:24-ca-01770, 05/1:24-ca-60311, 06/1:24-ca-03539, 06/1:24-ca-03560, 06/1:24-ca-03572, 08/1:24-ca-02224, DC/1:24-ca-01215 (JC) Modified on 7/12/2024 (JC). EDITED SIGNED BY |
Filing 2 CONSOLIDATION ORDER FILED - RANDOM SELECTION HELD Consolidating 8 appeals that were pending in 6 circuits. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit was DESIGNATED Signed by RANDOM SELECTOR, Delora Davis, Operations Supervisor, and WITNESS, Marcella Lockert, Acting Clerk of the Panel, FOR THE PANEL, on 7/12/2024. Associated Cases: MCP No. 189, 01/1:24-ca-01617, 02/1:24-ca-01770, 05/1:24-ca-60311, 06/1:24-ca-03539, 06/1:24-ca-03560, 06/1:24-ca-03572, 08/1:24-ca-02224, DC/1:24-ca-01215 (JC) |
Filing 1 MCP Number 189 Assigned -- MULTICIRCUIT PETITION ACCEPTED FOR FILING re: pldg. ( #1 in Pending MCP No. 19) Associated Cases: Pending MCP No. 19, 01/1:24-ca-01617, 02/1:24-ca-01770, 05/1:24-ca-60311, 06/1:24-ca-03539, 06/1:24-ca-03560, 06/1:24-ca-03572, 08/1:24-ca-02224, DC/1:24-ca-01215 (JC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.