Antonetti v. Neven et al
Petitioner: Joseph Antonetti and Dwight Neven
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Case Number: 2:2009cv01323
Filed: July 21, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER that all remaining claims in the Petition are DENIED and that this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/11/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 42 Motion to Extend Time nunc pro tunc. Respondents to respond to Complaint by 2/13/2012. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
December 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER Denying 35 Motion to Dismiss. Respondents shall file an Answer to the claims remaining in the Petition within 60 days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/8/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
May 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER that Respondents shall file and serve an updated certificate of service reflecting proper service of the motion to dismiss and Exhibit 102 within 5 judicial days from entry of this order. Petitioner shall have 30 days from such service to file a response to the motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/3/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Granting 33 Motion for Partial Dismissal. Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 4/17/2011. Dwight Neven answer due 4/17/2011. Replies due 30 Days after service of answer. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/15/2011. (Attachments: # 1 copy of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Petitioner shall fully and timely comply with the Courts prior orders (## 26 & 30 ) within fifteen (15) days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; Copy of 26 Order mailed to Petitioner - ASB)
January 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER that Petitioner shall fully and timely comply with the Court's prior 26 Order within fifteen (15) days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
December 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Denying 27 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action will be dismissed without further notice if petitioner fails to fully comply with 26 Order, within 30 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
November 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER that the Court holds that the following claims are not exhausted: (a) the claims in federal Ground 1 alleging a denial of rights to confrontation, access to the courts, and equal protection of the laws; (b) the claims in Ground 2 alleging a de nial of rights to equal protection and due process in federal Ground 2; and (c) Ground 3 in its entirety. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from entry of this order within which to mail to the Clerk of the Court for filing a motion either for di smissal without prejudice of the entire petition, for partial dismissal only of the above-listed unexhausted claims, and/or for other appropriate relief. The entire Petition will be dismissed without further advance notice for lack of complete exhaustion if an appropriate motion is not timely mailed to the Clerk for filing. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/24/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antonetti v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph Antonetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dwight Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Represented By: Catherine Cortez Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?