Clark v. Neven et al
Petitioner: Michael Allan Clark
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Neven
Case Number: 2:2011cv00585
Filed: April 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leavitt
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 35 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is GRANTED regarding the court's decisions on grounds 2, 3, 4, 6, 7(A), 7(B), 7(C), and 9 of 35 Amended Petition. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/21/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER Granting 74 Motion to Extend Time to Reply to 73 Answer. Replies due by 10/30/2014. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER Granting 67 Respondents' Motion to File Pleading in excess of thirty pages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall take the necessary steps to correct the entry for 68 on the court's docket within ten (10) days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 46 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of entry of this order to file a motion for dismissal without prejudice of the entire petition, for partial dismissal, or other appropriate relief. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/31/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER that Respondents shall have 45 days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to 35 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner shall have 45 days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 05/20/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
February 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Extend Time to File First Amended Petition. Amended Petition for writ of habeas corpus due by 5/6/2013. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/7/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
November 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER that 22 Motion for Relief from Judgment and Order pursuant to FRCP 60(b) and 62.1 is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have 60 days to file an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. FURTHER ORDERED that 28 Motion to Substitute Attorney is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER re 19 USCA Order appointing counsel sua sponte for the purpose of appeal. ORDERED that the Nevada Federal Public Defender (411 E Bonneville Ave, Ste 250, Las Vegas, NV 89101, phone number 702-388-6577) is appointed as counsel to represent petitioner-appellant Michael Allan Clark. The Clerk is directed to notify the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of this appointment. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: CoA - MMM)
August 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/1/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
June 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting Petitioner's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner's Motion for leave to file a petition longer than normal 3 is GRANTED. Clerk to file Petition. Petitioner's Motion to extend prison copywork is DENIED. Amended Petition due within 30 days. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, forms to Petitioner)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dwight Neven
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Allan Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?