Randolph v. Naph Care, Inc. et al
| William Randolph |
| Lawrence Weekly, University Medical Center, Steve Skolak, Tom Collins, Dental Serv. Dept., En-Banc Panel of County Commissioners, EnBanc Panel Medical Board of Examiners, Christina Giunchigliani, James McLane, Naph-Care Inc., Psyche-Serv. Dept., Mary Beth Scow, Susan Brager, Lawrence Brown and Clark County Board Of Commissioners |
| 2:2011cv01704 |
| October 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| James C. Mahan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER Adopting in its entirety 12 Report and Recommendation. The Complaint is Dismissed and the clerk of court shall enter judgement. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDERED that a Status Hearing is scheduled for 1/5/2012 at 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston. FURTHER ORDERED that only Plaintiff, William Randolph, is required to appear in Court for this hearing. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on the plaintiff by certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 11/30/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
