Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Blehco 520, LLC et al v. The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Blehco 520, LLC, William Randolph Stinson, II and Ram Linga Reddy Dornala
Defendant:
The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lang v. Clinton et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jason William Lang
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Barack Hussein Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Puello et al v. Weber Farhat OConnor Realty Management Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Eric Puello
Defendant:
Weber Farhat OConnor Realty Management Inc. d/b/a Weber Farhat Realty Management Inc., Weber Farhat Realty Management Inc., Jeffrey Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Randolph v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 1:2021cv10858
Plaintiff:
William Randolph
Defendant:
Mondelez International, Inc. and Mondelez Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Love v. June et al
as 8:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Grant Love
Defendant:
William Randolph June and Pinellas Park Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUZZALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02602
Petitioner:
WILLIAM RANDOLPH MUZZALL, V
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
William King v. O'Bell Winn
as 20-1521
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM RANDOLPH KING
Respondent / Appellee:
O'BELL T. WINN, Warden named as State of Michigan
Randolph v. KSNV et al
as 2:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Financial Corporation, Show Media LLC, TCPA and others
Plaintiff:
William Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
