Brown v. Neven et al
| Cornelius Brown |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Neven |
| 2:2012cv00922 |
| May 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| George Foley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER Denying 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk Shall Enter Judgment Accordingly. It Is Further Ordered that a Certificate of Appealability is Denied. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/31/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that all claims in the petition, as amended, are DISMISSED except for the claim in amended Ground 1. Respondents shall have 60 days from entry of this order within which to respond to the sole remaining ground in the petition, as amended. Petitioner shall have 30 days from service of the answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF CC: AG, Petitioner with 4 Amended Petition - SLR)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice with leave to Amend within 30 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 04/10/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: 5 Copies of Petition Form, Instructions, and filed 1 Writ of Habeas Corpus to Petitioner - AC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
