Groneman v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Janine L Groneman
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2012cv01839
Filed: October 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. Plaintiff Janine L. Groneman's attorney, Marc V. Kalagian, is awarded attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $19,288.00. FURTHER ORDERED that Marc V. Kalagian shall reimburse plaintiff Janine L. Groneman the amount of $3,500.00 for EAJA fees previously paid by the Commissioner. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Granting 38 Motion for Attorney's Fees. Plaintiff Janine L. Groneman's attorney, Marc V. Kalagian, is awarded attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $19,288.00. FURTHER ORDERED that Marc V. Kalagian shall reimburse plaintiff Janine L. Groneman the amount of $3,500.00 for EAJA fees previously paid by the Commissioner. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. Janine L. Groneman is awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $3,500.00. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 2/9/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Denying Defendant's 31 Motion to Amend/Correct 28 Clerk's Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/4/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
February 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Accepting Magistrate Judge Foley's 22 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 20 Motion for Reversal or Remand is Granted. Defendant's 21 Cross-Motion to Affirm is Denied and this case is Remanded to the Social Securi ty Administration for the payment of disability benefits to the Plaintiff. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay the filing fees in this matter upon the receipt of the payment of past due benefits. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Denying as moot 11 Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Groneman v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janine L Groneman
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Represented By: Leonard H Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?