Rand v. Patsalos-Fox et al
| Nahum Rand |
| Paul Bartlett, Tim Connor, InfoNow Corporation, Michael Patsalos-Fox, Michael Patterson, Rho Ventures, Sequel Venture Partners and Vedanta Capital LP |
| 2:2015cv01510 |
| August 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| George Foley |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 10 Stipulation to Transfer Case to the District of Colorado. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/10/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/10/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Granting 7 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 1 Complaint. Paul Bartlet, Michael Patsalos-Fox, Michael Patterson, and Vedanta Capital LP answer due 9/9/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
