Banark v. Dzurenda et al
Lonnie Lee Banark |
James Dzurenda, R. Hannah, Hughes, Jefferies, Skulstad and Ashley Smith |
2:2016cv02555 |
November 3, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
James C. Mahan |
George Foley |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 61 plaintiff's objection to the court's decision to close the case be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 64 plaintiff's motion to reopen case be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 59 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 53 defendants Hughes and Skulstad's motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 57 ORDER Re: 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Nathan Hughes and Holly Skulstad shall file a supplemental brief to their motion for summary judgment containing an authenticated copy of AR 740.04 within seven (7) days from the date of this order.Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 52 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 51 Plaintiff's Motion for an Enlargement of Time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint no later than 6/14/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 46 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 45 Plaintiff's Motion for an Enlargement of Time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint no later than 5/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 32 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 30 Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement an Existing Civil Rights Complaint is DENIED, without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a proper motion to amend his complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 31 Motion for Current Magistrate Judge to be Excluded is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER denying 22 Motion to add defendants. (see order for details). Nevada Department of Corrections shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits to Plaintiff's account. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, Finance, NDOC - JM) |
Filing 14 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 the motions for screening order/status checks are DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 4 , 5 , 6 , 13 the motions to correct complaint are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send to Plaintiff the approved form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of 1 -1 his complaint and 4 , 5 , 6 , 13 motions to correct complaint. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.