Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lonnie Banark v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 20-15313
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN HUGHES, CCS II, HOLLY SKULSTAD, CCS II, SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
THOMAS, Caseworker, JEFFERIES, CCS, R. HANNAH, CCS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 19-16872
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and ADAMS, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-17085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-15006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Banark v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2016cv02555
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Banark
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, R. Hannah, Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 16-16793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Banark v. Adams et al
as 2:2016cv01948
Respondent:
Warden Adams and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Banark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 16-16397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 16-16385
Petitioner - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Respondent - Appellee:
ADAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
