Paez v. Neven et al
Petitioner: Evier Diaz Paez
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Neven
Case Number: 2:2016cv02737
Filed: November 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER DENYING 10 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. A Certificate of Appealability is Denied and the clerk is instructed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 47 Motion to Extend Time : Respondents have until June 14, 2019, to file their answer to the remaining claims of the petition in this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 44 petitioner's motion is GRANTED: the court will construe Ground 4 as a Sixth Amendment effective-assistance-of-counsel claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ground 5, Ground 7, in part, as set forth in my orde r of 1/15/19, Ground 8, and Ground 9 except as to Ground 9(D) are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents have until 4/15/19, to file an answer to the remaining claims in the petition. Petitioner will have 30 days from service of the answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/14/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER denying 30 Motion for Appointment of Counsel ; ORDER denying 39 Motion for Leave to File Document; ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss (see order for details); Paez must do one of these three things by February 14, 2019, or this mixed petition will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting 40 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 39 Motion for Leave to File Document. Responses due by 9/20/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 36 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 25 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 7/26/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
May 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 25 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 7/2/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
April 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 23 Motion to Extend Time; Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 4/16/2018; Dwight Neven answer due 4/16/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying 11 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order; ORDER denying 12 Motion for Appointment of Counsel ; ORDER denying 13 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
March 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting 20 Motion to Extend Time; Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 4/12/2018; Dwight Neven answer due 4/12/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
January 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 18 Motion to Extend Time; Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 3/8/2018; Dwight Neven answer due 3/8/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Payment of filing fees or new IFP due 10/27/2017.; denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. denying 3 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: 2 IFPs to P - JM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paez v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dwight Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Evier Diaz Paez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?