Garcia v. Gentry et al
||Espino, Gentry and NDOC
||December 6, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Nevada
||Las Vegas Office
||Peggy A. Leen
||James C. Mahan
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 11, 2017
ORDER Granting 4 Motion to Extend Time. FURTHER ORDERED that on or before Tuesday, January 31, 2017, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form with complete financial attachmen ts in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); or (2) pay the full $400 fee for filing a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $50 administrative fee). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/11/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|December 13, 2016
ORDER that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice to tile a new application. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pau peris by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either file a fully complete ifp application or pay the filing fee. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?