Williams v. Allen et al
| Nathan Williams |
| Sgt Allen, F. Dreesen, J. Gentry and Rodarte |
| 2:2017cv01612 |
| June 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER granting ECF No. 93 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/25/2023. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/12/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER to Produce for Videoconference Nathan Williams, #77356. Status Conference set for 3/23/2023 at 08:30 AM in LV Chambers - Videoconference before Judge Richard F. Boulware II. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/8/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER to Produce for Videoconference Nathan Williams, #77356. Video Status Conference Hearing set for 12/2/2022 at 11:00 AM in LV Chambers - Videoconference before Judge Richard F. Boulware II. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/22/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Granting 61 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be referred to the Pro Bono Program adopted in Second Amended General Order 2019-07 for the purpose of screening for financial eligibility (if nec essary) and identifying counsel willing to be appointed as pro bono counsel for Plaintiff. Plaintiff is reminded that he must comply with all deadlines currently set in his case and there is no guarantee that counsel will be appointed. If counsel is found, an order appointing counsel will be issued by the Court, and Plaintiff will be contacted by counsel. IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that the Clerks office is kindly directed to forward this order to the Pro Bono Liaison. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/2/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ad hoc: Pro Bono Liaison - TRW)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 35 Motion to Extend Time; ORDER denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/29/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
43
AMENDED ORDER to Produce for 1/14/2020 Hearing Re: 41 Order. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: USM - JM)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER to Produce Plaintiff for 1/9/2020 Hearing. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: USM - JM)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Nevada Department of Corrections shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits to Pla intiff's account. Proof of service due 90 days from this order. Plaintiff shall serve upon defendant (see order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: NDOC, Finance - JM)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file his updated address with the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
