Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Quentin Salmond v. Nathan Williams, et al
as 23-3131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUENTIN SALMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
SALMOND v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv03806
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN SALMOND
Defendant:
NATHAN WILLIAMS, THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BRYAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv03205
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILLIAM BRYAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kinsley v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01222
Petitioner:
Nathan William Kinsley
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06804
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILLIAM BRYAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
WILLIAMS v. ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL and SURGEON JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
