Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Kinsley v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01222
Petitioner:
Nathan William Kinsley
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. NDOC et al
as 2:2022cv01743
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Defendant:
NDOC, LVMPD, Clark County Coroner's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2022cv01431
Plaintiff:
Victor Mara and Victor Mora
Defendant:
L. Montgomery, Tor Robinson, Nathan William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Williams v. Brian Williams , Sr., et al
as 22-16360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E WILLIAMS, Sr., GLEN FOWLER and NEVADA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Hernandez v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00944
Plaintiff:
Lino Hernandez
Defendant:
Dr. Stepke, Dr. Nasir, Dr. Erika Estock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hernandez v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00347
Plaintiff:
Lino Hernandez
Defendant:
Dr. BK Stepke, Dr. Nasir, Dr. Erika Estock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nathan Williams v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 19-17510
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN WILLIAMS
Williams v. Williams Sr et al
as 2:2018cv01363
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Defendant:
Brian E Williams Sr, Nevada Dept of Corrections and Glen Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gentry et al
as 3:2017cv00365
Respondent:
Joe Gentry and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Nathan Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
