Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Quentin Salmond v. Nathan Williams, et al
as 23-3131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUENTIN SALMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
SALMOND v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv03806
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN SALMOND
Defendant:
NATHAN WILLIAMS, THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinsley v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01222
Petitioner:
Nathan William Kinsley
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL and SURGEON JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NDOC et al
as 2:2022cv01743
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Defendant:
NDOC, LVMPD, Clark County Coroner's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2022cv01431
Plaintiff:
Victor Mara and Victor Mora
Defendant:
L. Montgomery, Tor Robinson, Nathan William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Williams v. Brian Williams , Sr., et al
as 22-16360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E WILLIAMS, Sr., GLEN FOWLER and NEVADA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
COUNCIL v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL COUNCIL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, JEFF SESSIONS, R. BRYAN HARWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00944
Plaintiff:
Lino Hernandez
Defendant:
Dr. Stepke, Dr. Nasir, Dr. Erika Estock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hampton v. Page et al
as 3:2021cv00077
Defendant:
John Moss, Clinton Baker, Joe Page and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
