Pasaye v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al
| Marcos Pasaye |
| Calderin, James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash, Nevada Department of Corrections, State of Nevada, ex rel and Brian Williams |
| 2:2017cv02574 |
| October 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 50 Defendants motion to dismiss. The plaintiff's federal claims are dismissed with prejudice, and his state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice to his ability to file a new action alleging these state-law claims in stat e court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the plaintiff's 58 motion to amend is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the plaintiff's 59 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The plaintiffs 62 motion for excusable neglect is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT for the defendant and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/1/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 52 Motion to Extend Time Re: 50 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/14/2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Granting in part Defendants' 27 Motion for Reconsideration. The injunction issued on 3/22/2019 is DISSOLVED and no longer in effect. Plaintiff's 39 , 40 , and 41 Motions are DENIED. Defendants' 45 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the 34 Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Answer deadline: 8/16/2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 30 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff's 31 Response brief is deemed timely. Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply to the Reply is Denied. Plaintiff is not permitted to file an additional brief regarding the pending 27 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff's 4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and 17 , 20 Motions for a Decision are Denied as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 3 Motion/Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. In the event that this action is dismissed the full filing fee must still be paid. Service must be perfected within 90 days from the date of this order pursuant t o Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Within 21 days of the date of entry of this order the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff re defendants for whom it does/does not accept service for. This case is no longer stayed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Chief of Inmate Services; electronically serve Attorney General this Order and 7 Complaint; Finance - SLD)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 12 First Motion to Extend Time Re: 4 Motion for TRO and 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff's Replies due by 9/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
