Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Moore v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Laketha Moore
Defendant:
William Reubart, Jennifer Nash, Gabrielle Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Nejara et al
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Garbriela Nejara, Karissa Currier, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leslie v. Ofcer. Bowen et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Emerson Leslie
Defendant:
Ofcer. Bowen and Jennifer Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Dashod Reed
Defendant:
Ruiz and Jennifer Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
K. McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galdamez v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Eriberto Galdamez
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, James D'Zurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Reed v. Brandon Stubbs, et al
as 23-15386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEVOYD REED
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDON STUBBS, JONATHAN RIVERA and AARON DICUS
Defendant:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, JENNIFER NASH, Associate Warden/Grievance Coordinator, KARSKY, CERT C/O and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
